Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Guns, Bar, Assault Rifle!!!

It's a MSM journalist's dream come true.

Let's see what happened:
  • Shortly before 3 a.m., officers saw a case they thought might contain a firearm in the back of the truck. - To the best of my knowledge, from researching here, there's nothing illegal about having a firearm in a case in your vehicle.
  • Officers talked to the men and then found an AK-47 assault rifle inside the case. - Wait, exactly what happened there? Why were the police allowed to search their personal property?
  • Two Kansas City, Mo., men, ages 20 and 22, and a 22-year-old Kansas City, Kan., man were issued notices to appear in court. - Was there even a crime committed (other than the confiscation of the guns by the officers)?
  • Police have confiscated several weapons found in vehicles in the same area over the past few months. - No mention is made of any law being broken, only property seized. Apparently that doesn't bother anyone in the press.

Now we have the dubious use of terms like "AK-47" and "assault rifle" to deal with. An assault rifle is defined as "a type of automatic rifle generally defined as a selective fire rifle or carbine, chambering intermediate-powered ammunition." So these guys were carrying a machine gun, and they weren't arrested? They were just asked to appear in court? Again, the term AK-47 refers to a specific model of assault rifle, which again is a machine gun and has been heavily regulated since 1934.

Which is more likely: The men were found in possession of an unregistered machine gun and were simply asked to appear in court, OR the journalist got all excited about getting to write a story about mean ol' assault rifles and throw around words like AK-47 willy-nilly with total disregard for factual integrity?

Update: Here is another account of the story. It adds: that "three Kansas City area men received notices to appear in court for having firearms near a drinking establishment."

Update II: Here is the Lawrence, KS statute that basically says:

(B) It shall be unlawful for any person to possess a firearm within a drinking establishment or on publicly accessible property in close proximity to the premises of any drinking establishment.
(C) It shall be unlawful for any person to possess a dangerous knife within a drinking establishment.

Of course, the devil is in the details. "Close proximity" is 200 feet. Folding pocket knives under 4" are exempt. Firearms in a case are exempt. Firearms unloaded without a magazine or other speed loading device are exempt.

So, unless the "AK-47" (or either of the pistols) was loaded in the case, the guys shouldn't be in any trouble.

File under: Media bias/ignorance, Gun Laws

2 Comments:

Blogger BobG said...

It sounds to me like a non-story that has been blown out of proportion by the media. If anything, the real story would be in why they were hassled for possessing firearms. Unless there are some local ordinances, or they are not legally able to own firearms, there is no reason they should have been detained. I would like to see more information on this before reaching any conclusions; if you happen to hear more about it, please post it.

June 27, 2006 11:28 AM  
Blogger nicolas said...

Hopefully the updates give the information you're looking for.

June 28, 2006 6:36 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home